Advice :: Internet Addiction | ArticleBiz.com

Fighting Internet Addiction

It’s fairly easy to spot internet addiction. They see the mood swings and make excuses to others. Internet addiction is a very real condition that affects households worldwide.

They want complete privacy when they are online. It may be issues at school with children. They must not only endure the emotional “mess” they must clean up after their loved one.

Any addiction becomes an actual “addiction” when it negatively affects the lives of both the addict and all those around them. The addicted individual withdraws from real people and becomes more focused with individuals they know online. Internet addiction has taken so many years to become established due to the disbelief many have over its legitimacy. What is it that causes this? What are the symptoms? Many people mistakenly believe it’s merely a penchant for checking email or losing track of time while playing a game. Internet addiction is not the same and it’s consequences can be far more devastating. Many internet addicts, however, aren’t classified with any of these more typical vices. If you try to talk to them, you will be ignored. The “fix” is pretending to be someone else. It may be a private method for indulging in what is actually a gambling or pornography addiction. Many will not even stop to talk with people who are visiting. Most internet addicts do have an ulterior motive for being online so much. Internet addiction is completely curable and there’s no reason to endure it any longer.

. They often make excuses to stay home more, but when they are home, they may seem apprehensive or depressed until they can find a good reason to go online.

The greatest tragedy to it all is that those around the addicted individual are the real victims. The best time to act is now. They may exhibit personality qualities much like “Dr. Hyde.” They are horrible to live with offline, but as long as they have that connection, they are relatively normal.

It often requires professional help to break internet addiction. It may be serious problems in the workplace due to inattention or inactivity. Jekyll / Mr. This form of addiction is completely psychological. This can be skyrocketing bills from gambling or substances. Some may have complete alter identities through the internet. The most important step is to force the individual to see there is a serious problem.

There are individuals who like to use the internet as a method of escape from their daily lives. They watch their loved ones morph into someone else. Substance abusers may find it easier to purchase their drug of choice through the internet

2015 NCAA tourney betting guide

Not one I’m going to overthink here, as Butler is worth a play as an underdog, preferably at plus-2.

Tuley: As we’ve all seen over the years, when an underdog is live during March Madness, they often pull the outright upset instead of just covering. Ohio St. The Sooners are also on a 10-3 SU run, and are 23rd in the nation in rebounds. No. Gonzaga

8. This is a long-winded way of saying that the committee put VCU in at a No. No. 11 Boise St./Dayton winner

Westgate line: Utah -6

PickCenter consensus pick: 59 percent picked Stephen F. Purdue

West Virginia minus-4.5 vs.

South | West | Midwest | East South Regional

No. 10 when a lot of people would argue those should be switched. For short-priced dogs, I might just bet only the money line with Davidson plus-120 over Iowa, VCU plus-145 over Ohio State or UCLA plus-150 over SMU, as I’m basically picking them because I believe they will win.

ATS pick: Notre Dame -12

ATS pick: Gonzaga -16.5

Westgate line: West Virginia -4.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 52 percent picked West Virginia

Tuley: Well, this region is looking rather chalky so far, but I believe that ends here (though I do have some trepidation as Eastern Washington is becoming such a trendy pick). 5 (and for good reason), but I think the oddsmakers had this right when they opened Northern Iowa as a 7.5-point favorite. Wisconsin is tops in the Big Ten in points allowed, second in free throws, second in field goal shooting and rebound margin. Oklahoma State has excellent balance with 6-7 senior Le’Bryan Nash (17 PPG, 5.4 RPG) and 6-8 senior Michael Cobbins up front, plus junior Phil Forte III (15 PGG). No. However, it troubles me that this line is so short (years ago, this would be well into double digits) and I’m just afraid that in the end, Baylor will win out. 12 seed). 8 NC State Wolfpack vs. No. It all looks so easy that I hope it’s not one of those things that are too good to be true.

No. Kentucky

4. Besides, a lot of people think the Hoyas are overseeded; in fact, the BPI had them as a No. The Bulldogs held a plus-7.3 rebounds-per-game edge in Big East play — 3.9 rebounds per game better than second-best Providence. But I’m going contrarian here. But I don’t expect Arizona to rack up a ton of points and run up the score, either. Now, it’s a sliding scale. Coach Mike Brey is 11-3 hitting the under in NCAA tournament games at Notre Dame.

No. The state of college basketball — slower, and lower scoring — makes it so “superior” teams aren’t always asked to cover big numbers. 8 Cincinnati Bearcats vs. Statistically, the Bulls are fairly sound in the turnover department (15.2 percent vs. 7 VCU Rams vs. Cincinnati chews up tons of clock trying to get the ball in the paint to Octavius Ellis. 9 Oklahoma State Cowboys

More money hits the market during the NCAA tournament than any other time in the sports betting calendar. You’re going to run into situations in the tournament where hot shooting beats good defense, but in this instance, I want my money on the far more complete basketball team. Seven-footer  Frank Kaminsky, 6-7 Nigel Hayes and 6-8  Sam Dekker are a handful for any frontcourt and will overmatch Coastal Carolina, whose top rebounder is 6-7 Badou Diagne. No. 1 Wisconsin Badgers vs. Everyone is buying into the hype of the nation’s leading scorer, Tyler Harvey (22.9 PPG), and that the Eagles get to play in their home state while Georgetown has to travel all the way across the country from the “other” Washington. 11 UCLA Bruins

Tuley: This line climbed from UNC minus-9 to minus-10, and I liked it more and more — until it got bet back to 8.5. 13 Valparaiso Crusaders

ATS pick: Northern Iowa -7.5

Westgate line: Gonzaga -16.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 54 percent picked North Dakota St. 9 LSU Tigers

Bettors can also use the public betting trends available on ESPN Chalk’s Live Odds page to track favorites receiving less than 50 percent of spread bets.

By David Solar, SportsInsights.com

No. 4 Georgetown Hoyas vs. The Cowboys come in off a bad offensive game against Oklahoma, but they are 6-1-1 ATS after scoring fewer than 50 points in their previous game. This isn’t your typical Valpo team, as the Crusaders play at a plodding pace and win with defense (0.94 points per possession allowed). The Tigers turned it over 17 times to Auburn’s attacking guards, and this is an equally tough backcourt matchup.

Selvaggio: Utah (75-1 at CG Technology; 60-1 at Westgate)

Wunderdog: Wisconsin got off to a great start this season and hasn’t slowed down. 10 Indiana Hoosiers

Lange: How is either team going to score? Both squads are tremendous at packing the paint, contesting shots and rebounding. The oddsmakers certainly think so, as they made Ohio State the favorite despite the seedings. They’ve lost two games all year: an OT loss at Arizona and a 3-point loss to BYU, the No. No. LSU

The first would be that instead of betting the fixed-odd futures to win the title, bet the money line in the first game your team plays and roll over your winnings through all six games. +1*

Midwest Regional

UCLA/SMU: under 134

ATS pick: Georgia +4.5*

Westgate line: Ohio St. North Carolina has every possible edge, but the Tar Heels don’t always show up, and they were just 14-13-1 ATS before finishing the season 5-2 ATS. -1.5

West Regional

No. No. No. If he’s not fully back in form (and he didn’t look like it in 26 scoreless minutes in the ACC tourney, including a miss on the possible game winner against North Carolina), that opens the door more for the Bruins.

Tuley: I liked Iowa State last year and was bummed when the Cyclones ran into another hot team that I was in love with (UConn) in the Sweet 16. minus-6 vs. John’s Red Storm

No. We all know the Harvard kids are smart, but Crimson have also won opening-round games each of the past two years. Austin Lumberjacks

This is a high total — the third highest on the board in the opening round. The Terps aren’t built to win by big margins, but this price appears cheap. Virginia

Georgia plus-4.5 vs. No. 15 Belmont Bruins

ATS pick: Butler +1.5

Westgate line: Arizona -21.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 58 percent picked Arizona

No. North Carolina

VCU plus-2 vs. Purdue

Notre Dame minus-12 vs. 11 seed and pretty far removed from the bubble). The Tigers have to be feeling the role of Cinderella, and I think they can stay within the huge number.

The 10 teams, according to Kornegay, lead bookmaker at the Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook, and his staff, that are the most popular teams to wager on as the tourney begins.

ATS pick: TBD

Lange: This is a classic case of overachiever (Butler) vs. 7 Michigan St. Albany is on an 0-5 ATS run and will get stomped by the talented and well-coached Sooners.

No. 14 Albany Great Danes

ATS pick: Belmont +16*

What this guide contains:

Andrew Lange: Bettors are faced with handicapping a dreaded “non-boarded” team here, as New Mexico State won the oddball WAC.

Teams I would consider: Iowa State at 9-2 to win the South and Baylor at 10-1 to win the West.

Fading the trendy underdog

ATS pick: TBD

Andrew Lange:

Perhaps bettors consider all tournament participants to be upper-echelon teams and are content taking the points regardless of opponent. 16 North Florida/Robert Morris

No. Spartans vs. 3 Baylor Bears vs. Furthermore, they’re playing their best basketball of the season right now, winning the Atlantic 10 title, and they will be taking on a turnover-prone Buckeyes team.

ATS pick: Cincinnati -1

East Regional

In last week’s conference tournament betting guide, we detailed a system that focuses on large underdogs in low-scoring games, and explained how public betting patterns change during the postseason. Wyoming made a nice run through the Mountain West Conference to steal a bid, but Northern Iowa has moved beyond that “Cinderella” category into a team that wouldn’t be a shock if it made the Sweet 16 (in fact, an argument could be made that the Panthers should be the No. The Badgers are 42-20-1 ATS in nonconference games and 20-8-1 ATS in their past 29 neutral-site games. No. 15 North Dakota St. 7 Wichita State Shockers vs. The Bulldogs have more than enough talent to hang with Duke and Kentucky.

Tuley: This line has risen from 4.5 to 5.5 since wagering opened Sunday night, which isn’t too surprising as everyone knows how MSU coach Tom Izzo gets his teams to improve as the season progresses (and we all saw how the Spartans took Wisconsin to OT in the Big Ten title game). 10 Georgia Bulldogs

No. Albany

NC State minus-1 vs. Coach Lon Kruger is outstanding, knowing how to get his team focused and prepared, and he’s very strong at in-game adjustments. No. No. Indiana

Maryland minus-4 vs. 2 seed Duke last year). No. However, I’m really high on Utah with its inside-outside tandem of guard Delon Wright and 7-foot center Jakob Poeltl, and this number looks a little short (again, because of the support for SFA as an ever-popular No. Cyclones vs. 6 seed instead of a No. The Utes are underseeded by most respected metrics, and the committee didn’t do them any favors matching them up against a tough Stephen F. And Mick Cronin’s absence won’t be as magnified with Purdue playing a nearly identical brand of basketball. -1.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 65 percent picked San Diego St. 4 Maryland Terrapins vs. 13 Eastern Washington Eagles

No. The Zags just won the West Coast Conference by winning two games 79-61 and 91-75. 15 Texas Southern Tigers

As the spreads get higher, the points are more likely to come into play and I’ll bet a smaller percentage on the money line: Georgia plus-210 over Michigan State and Eastern Washington plus-280 over Georgetown. 11 Texas Longhorns

Texas Southern plus-21.5 vs. But for the Aggies, it’s really all we have to go off considering they haven’t played anyone even remotely capable since beating UC Irvine at home in early January.

Westgate line: Providence -TBD

PickCenter consensus pick:

No. Iowa

Lafayette plus-23 vs. This team is 312th in the nation in assists and its top rebounder is 6-6 Sam Rowley. MAC opponents), but struggled to keep opposing teams off the glass. 5 Northern Iowa Panthers vs. It’s that lack of depth that has me looking to play against them in the next round, but not in this one.

Tuley: I have two things to say about betting futures.

Least profitable tournament coaches since 2005

ATS pick: NC State -1*

NCAA tournament teams, 2014-15 records

Cincinnati plus-1 vs.

Coaching is a huge part of any sport, but particularly in college basketball.

ATS pick: TBD

No. They have a similar profile to the Mountaineers with poor outside shooting (31.9 percent 3-pointers) but the ability to hit the offensive boards (36.5 percent). And while the level of competition in the Colonial (the 19th-rated conference, according to Sagarin) wasn’t all that stiff, Notre Dame isn’t known for its defensive prowess (1.07 points per possession allowed vs. -2

PickCenter consensus pick: 58 percent picked Ohio St. NC State is also 31st in the nation in rebounds. Oftentimes, those “snubbed” teams go on to lose right away in the NIT and the “overseeded” teams live up to their billing, while “underseeded” teams put in disappointing showings. Notre Dame

2. 1 Duke Blue Devils vs. Texas Southern comes in with 11 straight wins and covered the first two games in the SWAC tourney before winning but failing to cover in the title game, though that was a weird case (their opponent, Southern, was put on probation so the Tigers were going to be going dancing regardless of the outcome). They also have a tremendous amount of size, with a frontcourt that features players standing 7-3, 6-10, 6-9 and 6-8. Oregon leans too much on offense, as the Ducks were 10th in the Pac-12 in points allowed and ninth in rebounding defense this season. ACC opponents). This addition leads to a 12-2 ATS record with +9.45 units won and a 67.5 percent ROI.

ATS pick: TBD

No. The reason for this is if your team gets to the Final Four and you want to hedge, you’re gonna be paying a huge price to hedge with Kentucky on the money line.

ATS pick: Eastern Washington +7.5*

Tuley: I don’t expect Texas Southern to give Arizona too much of a scare as they’re overmatched talent-wise and don’t have a superstar or even a true big man. If you’re playing any other team and don’t want to parlay game to game (maybe you’re betting in Vegas and won’t be back after the opening weekend), bet the odds to win the regional (see below) instead of the odds to win the whole thing. 14 Northeastern Huskies

ATS pick: Stephen F. Georgia was on the bubble and secured its spot in the field by beating South Carolina in the SEC tournament, then sat second-leading scorer Kenny Gaines in the next game against Arkansas. 16 Lafayette Leopards

Note: Picks marked with an asterisk (*) are best bets. This is one of those instances, and it provides a very strong favorite laying a very reasonable price.

ATS pick: Oklahoma St. He will not get outcoached. 4 North Carolina Tar Heels vs. minus-1 vs. -4.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 70 percent picked Michigan St. 4. Mary’s, Baylor and Colorado State (average loss: 8.8 PPG). Kansas

10. No. Coastal Carolina

o picks for every NCAA tourney game on Thursday and Friday

o ATS records for every tourney team

o the best 2015 NCAA title value bets 

o Vegas handicappers’ best ATS bets, upset picks and over/under bets

o the best system bets from David Solar of Sports Insights

o the best and worst coaches in the tourney to bet on

o the top 10 public teams according to Jay Kornegay of the Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook

Wisconsin minus-18 vs. No. 14 UAB Blazers

Westgate line: Notre Dame -12

PickCenter consensus pick: 60 percent picked Notre Dame

Westgate line: Baylor -7

PickCenter consensus pick: 59 percent picked Baylor

ATS pick: Wisconsin -18*

ATS pick: Maryland -4

UCLA averaged more than 80 points per game at home this season, but just 62.7 on the road — a difference of more than 18 points per game. I’m not buying this one. 2 Virginia Cavaliers vs. Belmont is probably most known for nearly beating No. Lafayette did play at Villanova in last season’s opener and was tied with eight minutes to play before losing by 16 points (75-59). 12 Buffalo Bulls

No. No.

Eastern Washington plus-7.5 vs. Wisconsin is 4-0-1 ATS in its past five NCAA tournament games. 13 Harvard Crimson

Tuley: Villanova is for real, and hard to bet against at 24-9 ATS.

Westgate line: Villanova -23

PickCenter consensus pick: 53 percent picked Lafayette

ATS pick: San Diego St. As an underdog under Steve Alford, the Bruins are 17-7 hitting the under.

Tuley: Here’s another 5-12 matchup, with the public looking to the underdog to pull an upset. 7 Iowa Hawkeyes vs. 5 Utah Utes vs. Northeastern

Wichita St. Villanova

Belmont plus-16 vs. Iowa has a big size advantage, but unless Davidson goes stone cold, I don’t see the Hawkeyes being able to use that enough (at 2 points at a time) to keep up with the Wildcats.

Lange: From a betting perspective, the Terrapins went from underrated heading into Big Ten play (4-2 ATS start) to overrated after sweeping Michigan State (which went on a 1-8 ATS slide), and then back to underrated following six straight covers heading into the Big Dance. The WAC was one of the slowest conferences in the country, with the “fastest” team averaging 61.6 possessions per game in league play. 3 Iowa St. This team is 18-7-1 ATS after a loss, and 23-9-1 ATS on neutral courts. 16 Hampton/Manhattan winner

No. And I like the public dog, too. Austin is justifiably getting a lot of support as a live underdog, as it upset VCU last year in this round and a lot of people remember that and are looking for a repeat. The Mountaineers’ success in the “first meetings” in Big 12 play (6-3 SU/ATS) suggests we look their way.

Westgate line: Duke -TBD

PickCenter consensus pick: TBD

Westgate line: Xavier -TBD

PickCenter consensus pick: TBD

To be added after the Hampton/Manhattan “First Four” game on Tuesday in Dayton, Ohio.

Mark Few has had a lot of great players and teams at Gonzaga, but this may be his best. Austin +6

Westgate line: Iowa -2

PickCenter consensus pick: 53 percent picked Davidson

Lange: It’s the time of year when identifying the better defensive team in a short-lined game puts you in solid position to cash tickets. As a team, the Huskies shoot 52.9 percent from 2, 38.8 percent from 3 and 72.4 percent from the free throw line. 1 Kentucky Wildcats vs. The higher the spreads go, the less convinced I am that the underdog will win outright, plus the more the books will shave off the true odds, so I won’t bet as much on the money line. As much as I and most bettors despise Rick Barnes, it’s important to recognize that the Longhorns have the better personnel in this matchup. Arizona

3. When facing a winning team this season, UCLA was 17-6 hitting the under. -12

PickCenter consensus pick: 54 percent picked Iowa St. I say they caught a break by facing super-soft Indiana and a likely date against a reeling Kansas squad in the second round. In the end this is a very even matchup, but I think the Bearcats are still the play, even being bet to favoritism.

No. With public support shifting, we theorized that there would be value fading these so-called “trendy underdogs.”

Wunderdog: Northeastern/Notre Dame: under 141

Wunderdog Sports:

Westgate line: Virginia -16

PickCenter consensus pick: 58 percent picked Belmont

Westgate line: Texas -1.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 62 percent picked Texas

The second is specific to this NCAA tournament, with such a huge favorite in Kentucky. But except for Lawrence Alexander, NDSU is far inferior to the team that nearly made the Sweet 16 last year, and frankly, it wouldn’t be in the field if it hadn’t won the Summit Conference tournament. When this team was also an underdog in its previous game, the number of past matches is reduced dramatically, but we’re left with a 27-11 ATS record (+14.5 units, 38.2 percent ROI).

Most profitable tournament coaches since 2005

No. 4 seed, though it’s a moot point since they’re on a collision course with Louisville regardless).

ATS pick: West Virginia -4.5

1. 11 BYU/Ole Miss winner

Utah would be the only tourney future I see to hold a little bit of value. No. (Note: I am considering playing Georgia State plus-4.5 in the first half, though that still seems a little short.

No. 12 Wyoming Cowboys

Westgate line: Michigan St.

Below are the ATS records for every NCAA tournament team this season, along with each team’s SU record and average margin of cover.

No. Interesting side note in that for all the flack Barnes and the Longhorns have taken, they have an identical 17-13 ATS record as Butler. However, this puts Shaka Smart and his VCU program in the underdog role, where they’re more comfortable. Austin

Tuley: A lot of people are picking this game as this year’s mega-upset (like Mercer over No. 1 Villanova Wildcats vs. Gonzaga 6-foot-10 freshman Domantas Sabonis (9.5 PPG, 7 RPG), 7-1 junior Przemek Karnowski (11 PPG) and 6-10 junior Kyle Wiltjer (16.7 PPG) anchor an NBA-like frontcourt, while senior guard Kevin Pangos (11.5 PPG, 5 APG) gets things moving. 10 Davidson Wildcats

Maddux Sports:

Westgate line: Northern Iowa -7.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 60 percent picked Wyoming

Cincinnati plus-1 vs. For all of Texas’ length and size, the Longhorns were a solid, but hardly impressive plus-3.9 rebounds per game vs. No. John’s will likely stick with its four-guard lineup and push the pace while San Diego State will try to slow it down and control the game with its huge front line — especially compared to SJU with just 6-foot-6 Sir’Dominic Pointer to match up with 6-10 Skylar Spencer, 6-8 Winston Shepard and 6-7 J.J. But fear not: ESPN’s Chalk college basketball betting experts are here to help. The Cowboys lost their previous game against Oklahoma and opened as a 1-point favorite against Oregon. SDSU’s inside game and stubborn defense (the Aztecs allow just 53.1 points per game, ranked second in the nation) should get the job done.

With so few past system picks on the third tier of this system, it’s no surprise that there are no current game matches for the opening-round games. It took time, but Maryland’s offense looked improved the back half of the campaign. No. The public has mostly bet against UCLA, as this line opened SMU minus-2 at several books and is up to 3.5 at most books and even 4 at a few as of late Monday night. Buffalo

Wisconsin minus-18 vs. This is the best and most balanced Gonzaga team yet, playing in its backyard, so I can’t get on the NDSU bandwagon.

Tuley: Davidson has its best team since Stephen Curry led it to the Elite Eight in 2008, and this team might be even better overall. No. Kansas is at its best in transition, and I would expect it to push the pace and pull New Mexico State along.

Westgate line: SMU -2

PickCenter consensus pick: 67 percent picked SMU

ATS pick: Davidson +2*

ATS pick: Oklahoma -12*

Tuley: Every year, there are a few teams that get snubbed or a few teams that get overseeded or underseeded and cause heated discussions. Austin team in the first round, but the Utes play a very good brand of basketball that fits the tournament setting. The Red Storm will really miss suspended 6-10 shot-blocker Chris Obekpa. Another thing working for the underdog is that Lafayette coach Fran O’Hanlon is a Nova alumnus and there’s a chance the Wildcats won’t want to embarrass O’Hanlon by running up the score.

. No. While bettors overwhelmingly tend to take the favorite during the regular season, the NCAA tournament is a rare time when the public jumps all over the underdog.

No. If anyone asks if I think my dog has a chance to win outright, I’m going to say, “Of course!” On most of my plays, I’ll add a little something on the money line. 8 Oregon Ducks vs. 12 Stephen F. Tyler Kalinoski was the Atlantic 10 Player of the Year, but he’s far from the lone gunman as Davidson averages more than 10 3-pointers made (hitting at better than 40 percent from long range) and more than 80 points per game. 13 UC Irvine Anteaters

Tuley: UCLA’s inclusion by the selection committee was the most vilified decision on Selection Sunday (especially when the Bruins were given a No. Since Butler left in 2011, the last three Big Dance participants from the Horizon lost by margins of 15, 11 and 20 in the first round.

Lange: First thing’s first: Can Buffalo hang on to the basketball and rebound on the defensive end? No team in the MAC comes close to resembling West Virginia’s chaotic ways. The Wolfpack match up well with an LSU squad that is on a 6-4 SU run, bowing out fast in the SEC tourney (a 73-70 OT loss to Auburn as a 9-point favorite). Whatever the reason, our historical archive reveals a distinct change in public betting behavior.

During the regular season, a majority of public bettors take the underdog in just 17.65 percent of games; that figure reaches 23.82 percent for the NCAA tournament.

Championship title odds

Best title value bets

The table below summarizes the results of our analysis.

ATS pick: Lafayette +23*

Tuley: Everyone loves picking No. When dealing with mid-major teams, I’m hesitant to put much stock into nonconference play as a vast majority of games against power conference foes are played on the road. Some will say the Shockers are being punished for losing to Illinois State in the Missouri Valley semifinals. underachiever (Texas). No. 7 seed and Ohio State at No. No. That worked out well for me, but this year I’m hoping to be able to back Iowa State on a deeper run with Georges Niang & Co. Arizona

Harvard plus-8.5 vs. -12

To be added after the Boise State-Dayton “First Four” game on Wednesday in Dayton, Ohio.

No. However, we do have a Tier 2 match on Oklahoma State. However, I’ve seen this before where a team sneaks into the tournament and vindicates the selection committee (most notably VCU in 2011).

Wunderdog: You know what you’re going to get out of Oklahoma. 12 seeds against No. Northern Iowa

No. Georgetown

UCLA plus-2 vs. If bettors are willing to take a 12-seed over a 5-seed straight up, it makes sense that they would also be willing to bet the 12-seed getting points.

No. The issue is that Northeastern hasn’t faced an offense even remotely close to that of the Irish. If Harvard can dictate the pace, the experienced Crimson could pull another upset or at least keep this within the spread.

Wunderdog: Gonzaga (18-1 at Westgate, bet down to 15-1)

ATS pick: Harvard +8.5*

Westgate line: Wichita State -6

PickCenter consensus pick: 55 percent picked Wichita St. Oregon

Oklahoma minus-12 vs. Utah can play with anybody sans Kentucky in this field.

Enjoy and good luck.

ATS picks for every game

ATS pick: Texas Southern +21.5*

Westgate line: San Diego St. 10 Ohio State Buckeyes

One reason for this phenomenon may be that bettors are used to taking upsets in their brackets, making them more likely to gravitate toward the underdog. No. I will have some on Harvard plus-525 over North Carolina and Belmont plus-1200 over Virginia, but I’ll probably pass on Texas Southern and Lafayette at plus-2500 apiece over Arizona and Villanova.

Jay Kornegay’s top public teams

ATS pick: UCLA +2*

To summarize our handicappers’ best bets (lines are from the Westgate SuperBook as of Tuesday morning):

Wunderdog: Defense is key in March and Oklahoma State has it, as the Cowboys finished fourth in the Big 12 in points allowed, and fifth in field goal shooting percentage allowed this season. Albany got here by winning the America East, but didn’t step up in competition much. WVU’s Juwan Staten (knee) and Gary Browne (ankle) are still nursing injuries, but expected to play. 6 SMU Mustangs vs. SMU held opponents to fewer than 60 points per game this season — ranked in the top 20 in the nation. SMU

Davidson plus-2 vs. Duke

7. Michigan State

9. 2 offensive team in the nation. No.

Westgate line: Georgetown -7.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 73 percent picked Eastern Washington

Westgate line: Maryland -4

PickCenter consensus pick: 69 percent picked Maryland

Tuley: I’m conflicted on this game. 2 Kansas Jayhawks vs. We’ve asked our experienced group of wiseguys, including Dave Tuley, Andrew Lange, Dave Solar, Geoff Kulesa of Wunderdog Sports and Sal Selvaggio what they’re looking at when handicapping the bracket and picking tourney games.

Westgate line: Cincy -1

PickCenter consensus pick: 61 percent picked Cincinnati

Wunderdog: NC State is on a nice 6-2 SU run coming into the Big Dance. The Wolfpack are a tough matchup for a lot of teams with their three-guard attack of 6-3 junior Trevor Lacey (15.8 PPG, 4.4 RPG), 6-5 senior Ralston Turner (13.2 PPG) and sophomore Anthony Barber (12 PPG). 9 St. No. 6 Xavier Musketeers vs. Bison

Westgate line: Wisconsin -18

PickCenter consensus pick: 65 percent picked Wisconsin

Tuley: This game is a contrast in styles, as St. No. The team was 1-3 SU and 2-2 ATS in their absence. Larry Krystkowiak is one of the best coaches in the game and will hold an advantage over most on the sidelines. 12 Wofford Terriers

No. The Bulldogs obviously missed him on both ends of the floor, and it probably kept them from winning that game and finishing second in the league tourney to Kentucky. 2 Gonzaga Bulldogs vs. They also scored a favorable venue with Omaha and a short four-hour drive north from their campus.

Westgate line: Iowa St. Wisconsin

6. The Badgers come into the tourney fresh off a Big Ten title, winning every game by double digits. It’s a veteran team, too. Sure, the Super Bowl may take a larger handle than any individual game, but the cumulative number of bets taken during March Madness dwarfs even the mighty beast known as the NFL playoffs.

No. Aztecs vs. They challenged themselves in nonleague play with games at Wichita State, Wyoming, St. Against the spread, I’ll stick with a recommendation on the Lumberjacks plus the points, but I’m not sure I’ll play it myself, so I can’t make it a best bet.

ATS pick: Arkansas -6.5

ATS pick: Iowa St. Hammons. Unfortunately, this system would also include teams that were an underdog during their last conference tournament game. 9 Purdue Boilermakers

Westgate line: Kansas -11

PickCenter consensus pick: 60 percent picked Kansas

With more than 9.2 quintillion possible NCAA tournament brackets, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. 2 Arizona Wildcats vs. 16 Coastal Carolina Chanticleers

Westgate line: Oklahoma -12

PickCenter consensus pick: 56 percent picked Oklahoma

Our theory posits that when an underdog pulls off an unlikely upset, square bettors have difficulty accepting the team’s new role as a favorite. Offensive rebounding and garbage points are musts for Butler, because Texas is a fairly strong defensive team in the half court. Below is a list of the best and worst coaches to bet on in the NCAA tourney this year and their corresponding ATS tourney records.

No. Stephen F. However, the one thing in Butler’s favor is its ability to win the battle on the boards. The same can be said for Purdue’s two 7-footers, Isaac Haas and A.J. At the time of publication, OSU was receiving just 24 percent of spread bets.

No. All that stuff aside, we can only handicap the games in front of us, and while SMU is a solid team, I am convinced that if UCLA plays like it did against Arizona in the Pac-12 semifinals, the Bruins will be able to pull the upset here.

ATS pick: VCU +2*

No. No. I don’t think Buffalo will be overwhelmed, as they held halftime leads on the road at Kentucky and Wisconsin, but West Virginia is an extremely hard team for which to prepare. The Terrapins rely an awful lot on Dez Wells and Melo Trimble, and I would expect Valpo to play some zone. 3 Notre Dame Fighting Irish vs. In nonconference play, a number of NMSU’s games were in the high 60s to low 70s, possession-wise. Michigan St. No. Anyway, the added rest should help Gaines and put Georgia as a live underdog.

To be added after the North Florida-Robert Morris “First Four” game on Wednesday in Dayton, Ohio.

Tuley: Georgia State is an interesting underdog as it plays well on the defensive end, holding 11 opponents under 30 percent shooting this season. Coastal Carolina

Oklahoma St. 3 Oklahoma Sooners vs. UC Irvine has twin towers in 7-6 Mamadou Ndiaye and 7-2 Ioannis Dimakopoulos, but Louisville still has the matchup’s two best players in Terry Rozier and Montrezl Harrell despite all the players the Cardinals have lost. Indiana is a smoke-and-mirrors team that beat up on the weak and shot its way to wins at home — not a recipe for postseason success. Notre Dame can score, but both teams play solid defense, allowing points in the 60s. It almost always yields a better payoff, plus it gives you the option along the way to pull out profits or to stop altogether if there’s a key injury or something.

Westgate line: NC State -1

PickCenter consensus pick: 64 percent picked NC State

Tuley: Gonzaga is hardly even considered a mid-major anymore; instead, it’s the poster child for programs like North Dakota State, which upset Oklahoma last year in the Seattle subregional. A lot of NCAA underdogs have used a stellar defense to pull upsets or cover spreads against more athletic teams. A year ago at this time they played American in the opening game and won 75-35, allowing only 29 percent shooting.

Westgate line: Kentucky -TBD

PickCenter consensus pick: TBD

Dave Tuley:

Westgate line: North Carolina -8.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 68 percent picked North Carolina

To be added after the BYU-Mississippi “First Four” game on Tuesday in Dayton, Ohio.

Lange: Arguably the best attribute to have with a double-digit underdog in the NCAA tournament is high-caliber shooters, and on paper, Northeastern has just that. 2 Duke in 2008, but this year’s team was 25th in the nation from the floor at 47.6 percent, and won its last seven games, including an upset of Murray State to steal the OVC’s automatic bid. While managing egos seems to be the largest challenge for NBA coaches, imparting fundamentals and turning five talented individuals into one cohesive unit are just two of the struggles facing college coaches. No. However, the Wildcats are only 2-3 ATS when laying 20 points or more, so this seems to be the tipping point. They have great balance, with a strong frontcourt, while 6-4 junior Buddy Hield (17.5 PPG, 5 RPG) and 6-4 junior Isaiah Cousins (12.2 PPG, 5 RPG) run the backcourt and lead the team in scoring. No. 4 Louisville Cardinals vs. 6 Providence Friars vs. The Great Danes lost 64-60 to Providence and 75-59 to UNLV. Iowa State

5. The Ducks allowed 54.5 percent shooting the last game, an 80-52 loss to Arizona, and are 2-6 ATS following a loss of more than 20 points.

Pick: over 131

ATS pick: Louisville -9

No. Big 12 opponents. The American has some weak teams, but I give the Bearcats small edges on both sides of the ball. SEC Player of the Year Bobby Portis (yes, he won over all those Kentucky blue-chippers) and his teammates love to run, and I just don’t see Wofford keeping pace.

No.

Westgate line: Louisville -9

PickCenter consensus pick: 53 percent picked UC-Irvine

No. However, I think what gives Belmont a chance to at least cover is that Virginia’s leading scorer,  Justin Anderson, is coming back slowly from a broken finger and an appendectomy. Villanova obviously has the talent edge, but it’s not a size mismatch like we usually see with 1-16 matchups. Arkansas won 10 of its last 13 games, and two of those losses were to Kentucky. 5 West Virginia Mountaineers vs. Neither team will shy away from the transition game, but the opportunities will be limited, especially for Purdue as the Bearcats boast one of the best transition defenses I’ve seen this season. 5 Arkansas Razorbacks vs. On offense, they are strong in free throw shooting (76 percent), which is always a plus when games are close. 8 San Diego St. 15 New Mexico St Aggies

Westgate line: Arkansas -6.5

PickCenter consensus pick: 58 percent picked Wofford

ATS pick: Wichita State -6

ATS pick: Baylor -7

Westgate line: Oregon -1

PickCenter consensus pick: 60 percent picked Oregon

Tuley: This isn’t like one of the Louisville teams we’ve grown accustomed to seeing in recent years, and they look fade-able, but it looks like the committee did the Cardinals a favor with this seeding and matchup. To eliminate these teams, we focused solely on teams that won their previous game. I don’t see any potential matchup where I’ll be fading them, starting with the opener, as UAB needed the home court to win the Conference USA tournament as the fourth seed to earn its dance ticket. No. Valparaiso

I think it’s important not to punish NMSU too much for its conference affiliation, as the program recruits well and has been on solid footing throughout the Marvin Menzies era. 14 Georgia St Panthers

Best and worst coaches to bet on

Using Sport Insights’ Bet Labs software, we found that tournament favorites that receive less than 50 percent of spread bets have gone 86-65 ATS (+16.24 units won, 10.8 percent ROI) over the past 10 years. O’Brien. 6 Butler Bulldogs vs

Company Profile for Global Betting & Gaming Consultants

In addition to monitoring all of the

specialist industry press, both domestic and international, the company

also benefits from a daily electronic press cutting service that covers

more than 2,000 publications worldwide. Typically clients include, operators,

monopolies/lotteries, suppliers, investment banks, the major

consultancies, and governments.

Lorien Pilling

Phone:

 

Headquarters Address:

warwick@gbgc.com

CEO: Warwick Bartlett

Company:

COO: Mark Pilkington

GBGC’s tracks market data, regulation and

industry news as it happens. As a result they have a much more in

depth understanding of the key issues and the direction that market

 

Public Relations

lorien@gbgc.com

GBGC also provided the data on Internet gambling to lawyers representing

the government of Antigua in its case against the United States at the

WTO.

Our client base ranges from leading financial institutions such as UBS

and Dresdner Kleinwort to William Hill plc

 

Public Relations

Contact:

GBGC’s combination of operational and

financial experience combined with our gambling industry focus, our

extensive network of contacts and that fact that we are regarded as an

independent commentator on the industry means that we are able to

scratch the surface and get to the bottom of issues which can sometimes

be clouded by data alone.

With an international focus GBGC are able to offer clients an additional

perspective gained from researching markets, working on projects and

attending/speaking at conferences around the world. Consequently GBGC are the

most widely quoted source of industry data in share prospectuses and

analysts’ notes as well as on TV/Radio and in publications as diverse as

the Financial Times, Forbes, Time Magazine, BBC Radio 4, BBC Breakfast,

ITN news, the Economist and Fortune magazine.

Private

 

Industry:

+44(0)1624827138

Email:

 

Global Betting and Gaming Consultants

Head Of Research: Lorien Pilling

Consulting

 

Key Executives:

+44(0)1624827138

 

Type of Organization:

In addition to its consultancy GBGC has produced four reviews of the

global gambling market that have been widely acknowledged to be the best

available both in terms of both their detail and accuracy. GBGC

also keeps abreast of all the latest corporate news in the sector as the

company publishes the quarterly GBGC50 and iGBGC indices.

2nd Floor , 8-10 Malew Street

Castletown, OTHER IM9 1AB

United Kingdom

 

Main Telephone:

The statistics and forecasts that are contained within the Global

Gambling Report have become widely recognised, within the industry, the

financial community and the Media, as the industry standard for sizing

both the online and offline gambling markets. As a result in this

instance we would be able to offer knowledge of the European, Australian

North & South American and Asian gambling markets.

GBGC has established itself as the most credible specialist

international gambling consultancy in the world. We have advised the Government of Botswana on the

implementation of their new Gambling Act.

GBGC’s personnel spend all of their time

looking at the gambling market. This is monitored on a daily

basis with a newsfeed service being provided at www.gbgc.com.

In addition GBGC could offer the added value of the knowledge of over

200 additional betting, gaming and lottery markets around the world and

would be able to instantly highlight any relevant comparators, etc. The company has work

with or supplied information to over 400 clients the majority of whom

are ‘blue chip’.

. Projects have included market research/assessments, business/facility

planning, product evaluations, design/operational reviews, the

development/review of corporate strategies, license applications,

regulation development for and on behalf of governments, IPOs, M and A

and due diligence. The latest

review published October 2008 extends to over 1000 pages.

Warwick Bartlett

Phone:

Contact:

+44(0)1624827138

Email:

–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Global Betting and Gaming Consultants (GBGC) was established by its

Chief Executive and founder Warwick Bartlett during 1998. Bartlett has

an extensive track record in the gambling industry spanning some 40

years.

Bartlett was advisor to The Government of Malta for two years and our

advice helped Malta establish itself as the leading off shore gambling

jurisdiction